How External Pentesting Works and Critical Best Practices

What Is External Penetration Testing?

External penetration testing simulates cyber-attacks from outside an organization's network perimeter. It aims to identify vulnerabilities in internet-facing assets like web applications, email servers, and network infrastructure. This testing type helps organizations understand how well their external defenses can withstand attempts by malicious actors to breach their systems.

Typically, security experts, known as ethical hackers or penetration testers, conduct these assessments with the consent of the organization to ensure systems are secure against real-world threats. The main objective of external penetration testing is to protect valuable data and resources by finding security gaps before attackers can exploit them.

This proactive approach enables organizations to strengthen their security posture, reducing the risk of unauthorized access, data breaches, and asset loss. External pentests help ensure compliance with industry regulations and standards. The findings from such tests also provide vital insights into the effectiveness of current security measures.

External Penetration Testing Methodology

Here’s an overview of the external pentesting process.

1. Pre-Engagement

Pre-engagement involves discussions between the testing team and the organization's stakeholders to understand their security needs, goals, and concerns. Defining the scope, identifying testing boundaries, and establishing rules of engagement are essential components. These discussions also address logistical issues, such as timeline, resource allocation, and communication flow during the testing process.

In the pre-engagement phase, setting clear objectives is crucial. Goals could include identifying specific vulnerabilities, assessing the risk of external threats, or meeting compliance requirements. The phase also involves planning the tools and techniques to be used. Documenting everything discussed during this stage ensures a mutual understanding between parties, preventing misunderstandings during the testing process.

2. Scope Defining or Reconnaissance

Scope defining or reconnaissance is critical to understanding the landscape of the target environment. This phase involves gathering information about the organization's external-facing assets, such as IP addresses, domain names, and publicly accessible services. Proper delineation of the scope ensures the testing team focuses on relevant areas.

Reconnaissance involves passive and active techniques to collect publicly accessible information. Passive reconnaissance involves gathering data without direct interaction with the network or applications, using public records, search engines, and social media. Active reconnaissance involves directly interacting with systems to uncover open ports, running services, and system configurations.

3. Exploitation

Exploitation is the phase where identified vulnerabilities are tested to determine if they can be effectively leveraged for unauthorized access. This stage moves beyond theoretical vulnerabilities, simulating actual attack scenarios to evaluate the real-world impact of security weaknesses. The objective is to achieve a controlled breach of systems within the set scope, gathering evidence of exposure without harming the organization's assets or operations.

During exploitation, penetration testers might use pre-built exploits, scripts, or custom-developed attack methods. They aim to assess the strength of defenses, such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems, and determine how deep an attack can penetrate beyond the initial breach point.

4. Reporting and Remediation

Reporting and remediation involve documenting the findings from the penetration test and providing guidance on addressing vulnerabilities. The report details all identified weaknesses, the methods used to exploit them, and the potential impact if left unaddressed. It includes an executive summary, technical details for IT teams, and prioritization of findings based on risk level. The report also offers actionable recommendations for remediation.

The remediation plan should outline practical steps to fix identified vulnerabilities. It may involve patch management, updating configurations, implementing stronger access controls, or enhancing network monitoring. Collaboration between IT teams and security professionals ensures that the remediation strategies are feasible and align with organizational priorities.

5. Re-Scan and Certification

After vulnerabilities have been addressed, a re-scan is conducted to confirm that all security issues identified during the initial test have been successfully mitigated. This ensures that the remediation actions were effective and no new vulnerabilities were introduced in the process. Continuous revalidation is vital to maintaining a strong security posture over time.

Certification provides an official acknowledgment that the testing and remediation process have been completed satisfactorily, indicating the organization's commitment to security. This can help ensure compliance with industry standards and increase customer trust. Certification is often accompanied by a documented summary, rationalizing the security controls in place.

Tips From Our Experts

Mike Belton - Head of Service Delivery

With 25+ years in infosec, Michael excels in security, teaching, and leadership, with roles at Optiv, Rapid7, Pentera, and Madison College.

Map exposed assets using attack surface management (ASM) tools

Before testing begins, use ASM tools to discover all internet-facing assets, including shadow IT and legacy systems. This ensures the test scope covers every external entry point, minimizing blind spots attackers could exploit.

Focus on chaining vulnerabilities for realistic exploit paths

Attackers often combine multiple low-risk vulnerabilities (e.g., misconfigured services + weak credentials) to achieve significant impacts. Testers should simulate chained attacks to understand how these combinations could lead to breaches, which single vulnerabilities might not indicate.

Emulate attacker behavior with OSINT (Open-Source Intelligence)

Use OSINT techniques to replicate the reconnaissance phase of an actual attacker. Research public records, social media, and code repositories for sensitive information (e.g., exposed API keys or credentials) that could facilitate attacks on external systems.

Integrate phishing simulations to complement external pentests

Many external breaches begin with phishing attacks. Improve external pentesting by including phishing simulations to test email defenses, assess user awareness, and explore potential pivot points to external-facing systems.

Test for domain spoofing and email authentication weaknesses

Assess whether attackers could spoof the organization’s email domain by testing DMARC, SPF, and DKIM configurations. Weak or missing email authentication records can allow attackers to impersonate the company’s domain in phishing campaigns.

External vs. Internal Penetration Testing

External penetration testing focuses on threats originating outside the network perimeter, while internal penetration testing targets risks from within the organization's internal network. External tests simulate attacks by external threat actors, such as hackers trying to gain access to systems from the internet. Internal tests replicate scenarios where an attacker already has access to the company's internal resources, possibly due to a compromised internal account or device. Both types of testing are crucial for a thorough security strategy.

The difference in approach affects the techniques and methodologies used. External tests may focus on discovering web application vulnerabilities, open ports, and DNS configuration errors. Internal tests prioritize uncovering issues such as privilege escalation, lateral movement potential, and internal misconfigurations.

Related content: Read our guide to continuous penetration testing

External Pentesting vs. Vulnerability Scanning

External penetration testing and vulnerability scanning serve different purposes within a security framework. Vulnerability scanning is an automated process that identifies known vulnerabilities within the system without exploiting them. It provides a list of potential issues with minimal time investment, making it efficient for routine checks. However, scans do not assess the exploitability or contextual relevance of vulnerabilities, which is where penetration testing is more critical.

Penetration testing involves manual efforts by skilled testers who exploit vulnerabilities to understand their real-world impact. This approach provides richer insights into how weaknesses can be leveraged by attackers. While vulnerability scanning is more about breadth, penetration testing is about depth and accuracy.

Best Practices for External Penetration Testing

Organizations can ensure the effectiveness of their external penetration testing strategy by using the following best practices.

1. Assess External-Facing Applications and Services

External-facing applications and services are the entry points most exposed to the internet, making them primary targets for attackers. The assessment process involves identifying potential vulnerabilities in web applications, APIs, and network services. Regular testing helps uncover common issues like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, or exposed administrative interfaces.

The assessment should include manual and automated testing approaches to ensure comprehensive coverage. Automated tools can identify known vulnerabilities quickly, while manual testing allows for more nuanced and creative exploitation attempts. Prioritizing this assessment can prevent significant breaches and data loss.

2. Evaluate Network Perimeter Defenses

Evaluating network perimeter defenses is essential to identify weaknesses in the external security posture. This involves testing firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and other perimeter protection mechanisms. The goal is to uncover misconfigurations or other vulnerabilities that could allow unauthorized access.

A strong perimeter defense serves as the first line of protection, blocking many types of attacks before they can reach internal systems. Regular evaluation includes scanning for open ports, checking for outdated software, and testing rule sets for alignment with security policies. Continuous monitoring of logs and alerts helps in early detection of suspicious activities.

3. Test for Weak or Default Credentials

Many breaches occur because default settings on devices and applications remain unchanged. Testing involves systematically checking all external-facing systems for weak passwords or default logins, which could easily be exploited. Identifying and rectifying these weaknesses significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access.

Strengthening authentication mechanisms by enforcing strong password policies and implementing two-factor authentication boosts security. Regular audits and compliance checks ensure that credential policies remain effective. By prioritizing the testing and strengthening of credentials, organizations can prevent many automated attacks and brute force attempts.

4. Simulate Realistic Attack Scenarios

Simulating realistic attack scenarios helps in understanding how well an organization's defenses can withstand actual threats. This involves mimicking tactics, techniques, and procedures used by real-world attackers to breach systems. Such simulations can reveal gaps in detection capabilities and response processes, informing improvements.This helps security teams develop better incident response strategies.

Scenarios could include phishing attacks, malware deployment, or data exfiltration attempts, each designed to test different security layers. These exercises provide insights into how attackers might bypass defenses and the potential impact of their actions. By conducting realistic simulations, organizations can improve their preparedness and defensive measures.

5. Document Findings and Provide Remediation Guidance

Comprehensive documentation ensures that all discovered vulnerabilities are recorded accurately, with clear descriptions of their impact. This serves as a basis for discussing potential risks with stakeholders and prioritizing them for action. Clear, actionable remediation guidance helps organizations address security issues.

The documentation process involves creating detailed reports that include the methods and tools used for testing, as well as evidence of exploited vulnerabilities. This transparency encourages trust and cooperation between security teams and other organizational departments. Regular updates of these documents can guide future security strategies.

Related content: Read our guide to penetration testing types