Adversary Simulation in Cybersecurity: Process and Techniques

What Is Adversary Simulation?

Adversary simulation is a cybersecurity technique that replicates potential cyber threats by simulating the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by attackers. This approach allows organizations to evaluate their security defenses by understanding how a cyber-attacker might infiltrate their systems.

Unlike theoretical assessments or passive scanning, adversary simulations involve executing real-world attacks within controlled environments to ensure systems can withstand threats. These simulations are not about causing harm but understanding vulnerabilities.

By mimicking real adversaries, security teams can test their defenses, identify weaknesses, and update their security measures accordingly. Adversary simulation offers organizations an opportunity to proactively improve security by predicting and countering potential threats before they manifest.

Adversary Simulation vs Adversary Emulation

Adversary simulation and adversary emulation are related but distinct approaches to testing an organization’s cybersecurity.

Adversary simulation focuses on mimicking an attacker’s tactics to assess how a system withstands potential threats. It involves broad testing of defenses, often without replicating a specific threat actor, to uncover general weaknesses and evaluate response protocols.

Adversary emulation precisely recreates the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) of known threat actors. By emulating the behaviors of specific adversaries, emulation tests how well security teams can detect, respond to, and recover from attacks by a defined, real-world attacker. The goal of emulation is to validate defenses against particular threats that are highly relevant to the organization based on industry or threat intelligence.

Organizations often use both techniques in tandem—adversary simulation to assess broad defensive strength, and adversary emulation to prepare for known, high-risk threats.

How Adversary Simulation Works

Adversary simulation typically operates according to the following process:

1. Defining the scope and objectives: This stage specifies what aspects of an organization’s security the simulation will test. Security teams identify relevant threat scenarios by analyzing the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by potential adversaries. This often includes studying industry threat intelligence reports to understand which threat actors and methods are most likely to target the organization.

2. Designing attack simulations: These simulations replicate actions an attacker might take to exploit vulnerabilities, gain unauthorized access, or move laterally within the network. Techniques range from phishing campaigns to network infiltration, depending on the organization's risk profile and assets under scrutiny.

3. Carrying out simulations: During the simulation, attack sequences are executed in a controlled environment to prevent real-world damage. Security teams closely monitor and log each step, testing the organization's detection, response, and recovery capabilities. These logs provide insights into how quickly the organization can recognize and respond to threats, revealing weaknesses in current defenses.

4. Post simulation analysis: After the simulation, the team conducts a thorough analysis to document the findings. They provide a detailed report outlining identified vulnerabilities, missed detection points, and recommendations for enhancing defenses. Finally, the organization implements these improvements to close security gaps.

Tips From Our Experts

Mike Belton - Head of Service Delivery

With 25+ years in infosec, Michael excels in security, teaching, and leadership, with roles at Optiv, Rapid7, Pentera, and Madison College.

Integrate purple teaming for real-time feedback

Combine red and blue team efforts through a "purple team" approach, where the red team executes simulated attacks while the blue team actively defends and learns in real time. This collaboration accelerates skill-building, shortens response times, and strengthens detection capabilities.

Develop custom TTPs based on the environment

While using known attacker tactics is important, creating custom TTPs based on the environment's specific weaknesses (e.g., legacy systems or high-value assets) can reveal unique vulnerabilities that generic simulations might miss. Tailor simulations to target areas that real adversaries would likely focus on.

Use cyber threat intelligence (CTI) to prioritize adversary types

Not all threat actors are relevant to every organization. Use CTI to identify the most probable adversaries and TTPs targeting the relevant industry or region, and focus the simulations accordingly.

Map simulated TTPs to MITRE ATT&CK

Mapping simulated tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) to the MITRE ATT&CK framework provides a structured way to understand attack patterns and identify detection gaps. After each simulation, cross-reference with ATT&CK to highlight missed techniques and inform your defense strategy.

Incorporate lateral movement and persistence techniques

Many organizations overlook lateral movement and persistence in simulations. Include techniques like credential dumping, pass-the-hash, and backdoor implants to test the team’s ability to detect an attacker’s efforts to maintain access and expand control within the network.

Common Techniques in Adversary Simulation

There are many techniques used to simulate adversaries. Here are some of the main ones.

Traditional Penetration Testing

Penetration testing involves simulated attacks on a system to discover exploitable vulnerabilities before real hackers can exploit them. This proactive security measure allows organizations to uncover hidden vulnerabilities in applications, networks, and infrastructure that could be targeted in actual attacks. Through penetration testing, organizations can fix identified security holes before they become actual threats.

Penetration tests provide practical insights into an organization's security posture. They simulate what an attacker might do if they gained access to systems, guiding improvements in security mechanisms and policies to better protect sensitive data and resources.

Social Engineering Simulations

Social engineering simulations focus on threat scenarios involving the manipulation of human elements within an organization. These simulations evaluate how employees respond to tactics such as phishing emails, pretexting, or baiting. Simulating social engineering attacks allows organizations to assess their staff's awareness and preparedness, providing data to inform adjustments in training programs.

A specific type of social engineering simulation is a phishing campaign. This involves creating crafted emails or messages designed to trick employees into revealing sensitive information or downloading malware. Simulated campaigns are useful for assessing and improving an organization’s detection rates and response strategies to phishing attempts, which remain a prevalent threat vector.

These simulations are crucial in identifying vulnerabilities related to human behavior, which is often exploited in cyber-attacks. By replicating real-world techniques, organizations can educate employees on recognizing and resisting social engineering attacks.

Red Team Exercises

Red team exercises involve a team of security professionals simulating a real attacker to test an organization’s defenses comprehensively. This form of adversary simulation evaluates how well security teams can detect and respond to multi-phase attacks. The red team challenges existing security measures, providing a rigorous test of systems and procedures.

These exercises help identify gaps in threat detection and incident response capabilities. By challenging assumptions, red team exercises unfold unexpected findings, offering insights that strengthen security frameworks.

Best Practices for Effective Adversary Simulation

Implementing the following practices can help ensure a relevant simulation strategy that contributes to an organization’s security posture.

Define Clear Objectives

Organizations need specific goals to guide the simulation, such as testing incident response or evaluating security posture against specific threats. Clear objectives ensure the simulation is focused and measures the right metrics, providing actionable insights for security improvements.

Objective clarity also enables better resource allocation, ensuring simulations align with strategic business goals. With defined objectives, organizations can assess simulation outcomes, adjusting their methodologies or defensive strategies.

Use Realistic Threat Scenarios

Threat scenarios should reflect potential attacks that organizations might face, including tactics, techniques, and procedures known to be used by real-world adversaries. Realistic simulations provide a valuable understanding of actual vulnerabilities, helping organizations prepare for potential attacks.

This approach ensures that simulations deliver relevant and practical insights, encouraging adaptive defense strategies. By mirroring plausible threats, simulations test the resilience of security measures, enabling organizations to anticipate and counteract real attacks.

Maintain Ethical Standards

Ethical considerations are important in conducting adversary simulations. Ensuring that simulations do not harm systems or violate legal boundaries is essential. Simulations should be carried out transparently, with consent from stakeholders and adherence to regulatory requirements and organizational policies.

Maintaining ethical standards protects against inadvertently breaching privacy or causing unintended disruption during simulations. Ethical practices build trust with all stakeholders, reinforcing the integrity of the exercise and ensuring that simulations contribute positively to the organization’s security strategy.

Engage Stakeholders

Successful simulations depend on collaboration across departments, including IT, management, and legal teams, ensuring comprehensive understanding and readiness. Involving key stakeholders ensures alignment with business objectives and improves the simulation’s relevance and impact.

Stakeholder involvement also encourages transparent communication, enabling quick resolution of any issues during the simulation process. By actively participating, stakeholders contribute to enhanced security capabilities.

Regularly Update Simulation Techniques

As adversaries develop new strategies, organizations must adapt by refining their simulation methodologies to reflect current threat landscapes. Continuous updates ensure simulations remain relevant, providing accurate assessments of security defenses.

This proactive approach involves integrating the latest intelligence on cyber threats into simulation scenarios, keeping security measures responsive to new tactics and procedures. By maintaining up-to-date simulation practices, organizations improve their ability to anticipate threats and sustain risk management strategies.