Red Teaming: History, Methodology, and 4 Critical Best Practices

What Is Red Teaming?

A “red team” is a group of security experts within an organization, which aims to breach security measures and uncover vulnerabilities, to help the organization improve its defenses. This approach simulates real-world attacks, identifying vulnerabilities before malicious entities exploit them. Red teaming involves assessing security by viewing systems from an adversarial perspective.

Red teaming goes beyond conventional security measures, focusing on simulating adversary tactics. It involves not just technical evaluations, but strategic assessments of overall security posture, adapting to the evolving threat landscape.

The primary benefit of red teaming is that it evaluates how systems perform under realistic attack conditions, providing actionable intelligence for improvement. The goal is to enhance defense mechanisms by adopting an attacker-like mindset. This proactive assessment helps organizations bolster defenses and prioritize security measures based on real-world threat profiles.

History and Evolution of Red Teaming

Red teaming has its roots in military strategy, dating back to the early 19th century when structured opposition tactics were employed by armies to test their battle plans. The term "red team" originated from military exercises in which a designated group (the "red team") played the role of an enemy force to simulate attacks on a defending team (the "blue team"). This method allowed commanders to anticipate adversarial strategies and adjust their tactics accordingly.

In the mid-20th century, red teaming became a formalized part of military operations, particularly during the Cold War, where it was crucial for anticipating Soviet strategies. Over time, these practices expanded beyond military applications. In the 1990s, red teaming started to be adopted by private sector companies and government agencies for cybersecurity assessments, evolving alongside the growing sophistication of digital threats.

Today, red teaming is widely recognized in cybersecurity as a proactive approach to understanding and mitigating risks by simulating realistic attacks from the perspective of potential adversaries. The techniques have continually adapted to meet the challenges posed by increasingly complex networked systems and advanced cyber threats.

Related content: Read our guide to red team vs blue team

Red Teaming vs. Penetration Testing

Red teaming and penetration testing both aim to improve security but differ in scope and execution.

Penetration testing focuses on identifying and exploiting vulnerabilities in specific systems or applications. Its primary goal is to find weaknesses that can be patched, enhancing immediate security.

Red teaming simulates a full-scale attack to test an organization's overall defenses. It encompasses strategic and tactical layers, including physical security, social engineering, and threat analysis. Red teaming assesses response capabilities, allowing companies to improve detection and reaction strategies.

Related content: Read our guide to continuous penetration testing

Red Teaming vs. Purple Teaming

While red teaming involves simulating adversarial attacks to assess an organization’s defenses, purple teaming is a collaborative approach that combines both offensive and defensive perspectives.

In a purple team engagement, red teams (offensive) and blue teams (defensive) work together to share insights and refine security measures in real time. The goal is not only to identify vulnerabilities but also to improve detection and response capabilities through cooperative learning.

Purple teaming fosters knowledge transfer between teams, enabling defenders to better understand attack techniques and build resilience against them. This approach focuses on improving coordination and closing gaps in security operations by conducting iterative testing and feedback sessions. As a result, purple teaming enhances the effectiveness of both teams, leading to a more integrated and adaptive security posture.

Tips From Our Experts

Mike Belton - Head of Service Delivery

With 25+ years in infosec, Michael excels in security, teaching, and leadership, with roles at Optiv, Rapid7, Pentera, and Madison College.

Use "assumed breach" scenarios to test depth of defense

Many red teams focus on breaching perimeter defenses, but it's equally important to assume the attacker is already inside the network. Test for lateral movement, persistence, and privilege escalation, which will give a clearer picture of internal controls and segmentation effectiveness.

Conduct stealth exercises over extended periods

Real adversaries often operate covertly over weeks or months, especially in advanced persistent threat (APT) scenarios. Consider performing long-duration red team engagements to test detection and response capabilities over time, focusing on staying under the radar rather than rapid compromise.

Integrate threat intelligence to align with current adversaries

Tailor your red teaming approach by incorporating real-time threat intelligence to model the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) of specific threat actors relevant to your industry. This makes the engagement more realistic and relevant to your organization's current threat landscape.

Leverage attack simulations to test supply chain and third-party risks

Many attacks today exploit vulnerabilities in the supply chain. As part of the red team exercise, simulate attacks that might arise from third-party relationships. This includes testing how third-party access points, APIs, or vendor VPNs might be exploited to gain a foothold in your environment.

Assess Cloud and Hybrid Environment Security Controls

With more organizations adopting cloud infrastructure, red team exercises should include cloud environments. Evaluate misconfigurations, privilege escalation paths, and data exfiltration opportunities in cloud services and hybrid setups, as these are often overlooked areas in traditional red teaming.

Red Team Methodology

Here are some of the key components of a red team’s operational methodology.

Planning and Reconnaissance

During planning, the team establishes objectives, scope, and resources required for the exercise. Careful preparation ensures that the assessment accurately reflects potential real-world threats and effectively tests defenses. Clear objectives guide the exercise, helping align red team activities with organizational security goals.

Reconnaissance involves gathering intelligence on the target organization to understand its architecture, systems, and potential vulnerabilities. This phase involves passive information gathering and analysis, laying the groundwork for future attack simulations. By identifying possible entry points, the red team gains insight into the organization's security posture. This intelligence enables more accurate and effective attack simulations.

Attack Simulation Techniques

Attack simulation techniques are central to red teaming, involving various strategies to test organizational defenses. These simulations replicate tactics used by real adversaries, ranging from technical exploits to strategies like lateral movement and data exfiltration. Techniques such as phishing, network penetration, and application layer attacks are employed to identify vulnerabilities.

Tailoring attack simulations to mimic specific threat actors is crucial. Red teams must consider the organization's unique threat landscape and operational environment. By adopting diverse techniques, teams can uncover hidden weaknesses, enabling organizations to fortify defenses against potential cyber threats. This realistic assessment helps in refining security protocols and improves the efficacy of threat detection and response mechanisms.

Social Engineering Tactics

Social engineering tactics exploit human psychology to breach organizational security. Red teams use techniques such as phishing, pretexting, and baiting to manipulate individuals into disclosing confidential information or granting unauthorized access. This approach highlights weaknesses in an organization’s human element, an often overlooked security layer.

Understanding and replicating these tactics help organizations enhance their social engineering defenses. Training employees to recognize and respond to social engineering threats is crucial for building a resilient security culture. By revealing vulnerabilities in personnel practices, red teams enable organizations to implement strategies that reduce risks posed by social engineering attacks.

Physical Intrusion Strategies

Physical intrusion strategies assess the security of physical assets, a critical component of red team exercises. These strategies test entry controls, surveillance systems, and security personnel effectiveness. Techniques include tailgating, badge cloning, and exploiting physical security weaknesses to gain unauthorized entry. These tests highlight gaps in the physical security framework, necessary for protecting sensitive information.

Simulating physical breaches helps organizations improve physical security protocols and training. Red teams evaluate the robustness of access controls and identify potential vulnerabilities in physical environments. This assessment enables organizations to strengthen physical security measures, minimizing risks associated with unauthorized access to critical assets.

Reporting and Analysis

Reporting and analysis distill findings from red team exercises into actionable insights. Reports detail vulnerabilities discovered, tactics used, and suggestions for remediation. This information is crucial for security teams to understand weaknesses and develop strategies for improvement. Clear and precise reports facilitate stakeholder understanding and decision-making.

Effective analysis highlights patterns and trends, helping organizations prioritize security enhancements. It informs improvements in security policies and practices, fostering a culture of continuous learning and adaptation. By translating red team findings into practical recommendations, organizations can enhance their defenses and better prepare for future challenges.

Best Practices for Effective Red Teaming

1. Define Clear Goals and Objectives

Defining clear goals and objectives is fundamental to effective red teaming. These goals guide the exercise, focusing efforts on specific security concerns. Clear objectives ensure the red team activity aligns with organizational priorities, providing relevant insights. Precise goals facilitate planning, execution, and evaluation, enhancing the exercise’s value and impact.

Objectives should be measurable, allowing for assessment of success. They provide a benchmark for evaluating outcomes and guiding future efforts. By establishing clear goals, organizations ensure that red teaming activities deliver meaningful results, directly contributing to improving security posture and readiness against potential cyber threats.

2. Foster Collaboration Between Teams

Fostering collaboration between red, blue, and purple teams enhances the overall effectiveness of security assessments. By working together, teams exchange insights and strategies, bridging gaps between offense and defense. This collaboration ensures that findings from red team exercises translate into improved defenses and responsive strategies.

Cross-team collaboration promotes a unified approach to security. It breaks down silos, encouraging open communication and shared learning. By integrating diverse perspectives and expertise, organizations can develop more comprehensive security practices, better preparing them to counter evolving threats.

3. Maintain Operational Security During Exercises

Maintaining operational security (OPSEC) during red team exercises is critical to ensure the validity of the simulation and prevent unintended consequences. Red team activities should be conducted with strict confidentiality to prevent tipping off internal employees or third parties, which could skew the results or lead to unnecessary panic. This involves limiting the knowledge of the exercise to a select group of stakeholders and ensuring that the red team's tactics do not compromise actual business operations or sensitive data.

Strict OPSEC protocols help avoid accidental data breaches, business interruptions, or legal violations during the simulation. Teams should also establish clear rules of engagement, ensuring that activities stay within predefined limits and avoid causing any lasting damage to the organization's systems. By carefully managing information and minimizing exposure during the exercise, red teams can more accurately assess the organization's defenses under realistic conditions.

4. Focus on Realistic Attack Scenarios

Focusing on realistic attack scenarios is vital to ensure that red team exercises provide valuable, real-world insights into an organization's security readiness. Rather than relying on generic or hypothetical threats, the red team should tailor attack simulations to mimic the specific adversaries and tactics most likely to target the organization. This could involve advanced persistent threat (APT) simulations, ransomware attacks, or insider threats, depending on the organization's industry and risk profile.

By aligning simulations with current threat intelligence and real-world adversary behavior, organizations gain more relevant data on their vulnerabilities. Realistic scenarios also help the blue team and other stakeholders understand how their existing defenses perform under pressure, leading to more effective threat detection, incident response, and mitigation strategies. This focus on practical, contextualized simulations makes red teaming a powerful tool for continuously improving security postures in a rapidly changing threat landscape.

Outsource Red Teaming with Sprocket Security